e10vq
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2005
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from
to
Commission file number: 0-21969
Ciena Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
23-2725311
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1201 Winterson Road, Linthicum, MD
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
21090
(Zip Code) |
(410) 865-8500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2). YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at August 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value
|
|
577,963,967 |
1
CIENA CORPORATION
INDEX
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
quarters and nine months ended July 31, 2004 and July
31, 2005 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 31, 2004 and
July 31, 2005 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine
months ended July 31, 2004 and July 31, 2005 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. Other Information |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
|
42 |
|
2
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CIENA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
64,340 |
|
|
$ |
97,448 |
|
|
$ |
181,436 |
|
|
$ |
271,366 |
|
Services |
|
|
11,249 |
|
|
|
13,032 |
|
|
|
35,266 |
|
|
|
37,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
75,589 |
|
|
|
110,480 |
|
|
|
216,702 |
|
|
|
309,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
48,069 |
|
|
|
62,756 |
|
|
|
138,918 |
|
|
|
189,447 |
|
Services |
|
|
8,723 |
|
|
|
10,095 |
|
|
|
30,212 |
|
|
|
30,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold |
|
|
56,792 |
|
|
|
72,851 |
|
|
|
169,130 |
|
|
|
220,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
18,797 |
|
|
|
37,629 |
|
|
|
47,572 |
|
|
|
89,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
57,762 |
|
|
|
32,619 |
|
|
|
151,418 |
|
|
|
101,036 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
29,468 |
|
|
|
29,275 |
|
|
|
80,011 |
|
|
|
82,440 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
6,969 |
|
|
|
9,340 |
|
|
|
20,052 |
|
|
|
25,538 |
|
Stock compensation costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
|
|
5,473 |
|
|
|
4,048 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
4,257 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
12,667 |
|
|
|
9,653 |
|
|
|
19,458 |
|
|
|
30,268 |
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
30,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
13,547 |
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
22,125 |
|
|
|
15,245 |
|
Long-lived asset impairments |
|
|
7,217 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
7,217 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
Recovery of
sale, export, use tax liabilities
and payments |
|
|
(3,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful
accounts, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
(2,794 |
) |
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
158,326 |
|
|
|
91,103 |
|
|
|
330,998 |
|
|
|
266,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(139,529 |
) |
|
|
(53,474 |
) |
|
|
(283,426 |
) |
|
|
(177,049 |
) |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
4,936 |
|
|
|
6,765 |
|
|
|
18,228 |
|
|
|
19,787 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,469 |
) |
|
|
(6,406 |
) |
|
|
(20,326 |
) |
|
|
(19,348 |
) |
Gain (loss) on equity investments, net |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(1,708 |
) |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
(8,986 |
) |
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,882 |
|
|
|
(8,216 |
) |
|
|
3,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(141,262 |
) |
|
|
(50,941 |
) |
|
|
(293,347 |
) |
|
|
(181,714 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(141,467 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(294,391 |
) |
|
$ |
(182,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share and
dilutive potential common share |
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.58 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic common and dilutive
potential common shares outstanding |
|
|
566,234 |
|
|
|
576,331 |
|
|
|
504,812 |
|
|
|
573,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CIENA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
202,623 |
|
|
$ |
313,569 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
753,251 |
|
|
|
602,888 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
45,878 |
|
|
|
70,622 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
47,614 |
|
|
|
51,447 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
29,906 |
|
|
|
30,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,079,272 |
|
|
|
1,068,887 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
329,704 |
|
|
|
200,188 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures, net |
|
|
51,252 |
|
|
|
32,984 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
408,615 |
|
|
|
408,615 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
208,015 |
|
|
|
174,845 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
60,196 |
|
|
|
37,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,137,054 |
|
|
$ |
1,923,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
31,509 |
|
|
$ |
43,025 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
76,045 |
|
|
|
72,541 |
|
Restructuring liabilities |
|
|
16,203 |
|
|
|
15,201 |
|
Unfavorable lease commitments |
|
|
9,902 |
|
|
|
8,908 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
3,354 |
|
|
|
4,093 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
21,566 |
|
|
|
31,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
158,579 |
|
|
|
175,066 |
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
|
16,010 |
|
|
|
14,379 |
|
Long-term restructuring liabilities |
|
|
65,180 |
|
|
|
56,722 |
|
Long-term unfavorable lease commitments |
|
|
51,341 |
|
|
|
43,846 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
Convertible notes payable |
|
|
690,000 |
|
|
|
648,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
982,632 |
|
|
|
939,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock par value $0.01; 20,000,000 shares authorized; zero shares
issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
par value $0.01; 980,000,000 shares authorized; 571,656,659
and 576,908,483 shares issued and outstanding as of October 31, 2004 and
July 31, 2005, respectively |
|
|
5,717 |
|
|
|
5,769 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
5,482,175 |
|
|
|
5,485,595 |
|
Deferred stock compensation |
|
|
(13,761 |
) |
|
|
(2,925 |
) |
Notes receivable from stockholders |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in unrealized gains on investments, net |
|
|
(2,488 |
) |
|
|
(4,744 |
) |
Translation adjustment |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(477 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(4,316,896 |
) |
|
|
(4,499,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,154,422 |
|
|
|
983,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,137,054 |
|
|
$ |
1,923,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
CIENA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(294,391 |
) |
|
$ |
(182,829 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
8,216 |
|
|
|
(3,882 |
) |
Amortization of premium on marketable securities |
|
|
21,893 |
|
|
|
12,344 |
|
Non-cash impairment of long-lived assets |
|
|
7,217 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
Non-cash
(gain) loss on equity investments |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
8,986 |
|
Accretion of convertible notes payable |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
30,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of leasehold improvements |
|
|
52,325 |
|
|
|
26,803 |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
8,699 |
|
|
|
8,810 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
22,361 |
|
|
|
33,169 |
|
Provision of doubtful accounts |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence |
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
Provision for warranty and other contractual obligations |
|
|
7,179 |
|
|
|
7,546 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
2,072 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(6,505 |
) |
|
|
(27,348 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(7,229 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
13,533 |
|
|
|
5,194 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(77,793 |
) |
|
|
(17,789 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
Deferred revenue and other obligations |
|
|
3,268 |
|
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(197,157 |
) |
|
|
(119,179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to equipment, furniture, fixtures and intellectual
property |
|
|
(18,828 |
) |
|
|
(8,935 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
Purchases of available for sale securities |
|
|
(488,832 |
) |
|
|
(490,041 |
) |
Maturities of available for sale securities |
|
|
686,250 |
|
|
|
755,320 |
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
4,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minority equity investments, net |
|
|
(5,500 |
) |
|
|
4,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
178,357 |
|
|
|
261,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from other obligations |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of convertible notes payable |
|
|
(49,243 |
) |
|
|
(36,913 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
13,989 |
|
|
|
5,498 |
|
Repayment of notes receivable from stockholders |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(35,135 |
) |
|
|
(31,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(53,935 |
) |
|
|
110,946 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
309,665 |
|
|
|
202,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
255,730 |
|
|
$ |
313,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
CIENA CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The interim financial statements included herein for Ciena Corporation (Ciena) have been
prepared by Ciena, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, financial statements included in this report
reflect all normal recurring adjustments that Ciena considers necessary for the fair presentation
of the results of operations for the interim periods covered and of the financial position of Ciena
at the date of the interim balance sheet. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.
However, Ciena believes that the disclosures are adequate to understand the information presented.
The operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results
for the entire year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Cienas audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Cienas annual report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004.
(2) SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Segment Reporting
Cienas operations are organized into the following operating segments for the purpose of
making operating decisions and assessing performance: Transport and Switching Group (TSG); Data
Networking Group (DNG); Broadband Access Group (BBG); and the Global Network Services Group (GNS).
Goodwill
As of July 31, 2005, Cienas assets included $408.6 million related to goodwill. Because our
operations are organized into operating segments, SFAS 142 requires that we assign goodwill to
Cienas reporting units. Ciena has determined its operating segments and reporting units are the
same. In accordance with SFAS 142, Ciena tests each reporting units goodwill for impairment on an
annual basis. Ciena annually tests for impairment on the last business day of September each year, and
between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would, more likely than not,
reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. The following table
summarizes the assignment and changes in the carrying amount of Cienas goodwill to its reporting
units as of July 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSG |
|
|
DNG |
|
|
BBG |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
147,000 |
|
|
$ |
85,015 |
|
|
$ |
176,600 |
|
|
$ |
408,615 |
|
Goodwill acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
147,000 |
|
|
$ |
85,015 |
|
|
$ |
176,600 |
|
|
$ |
408,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets
Ciena accounts for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets such as equipment,
furniture, fixtures, and other intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets. During the first nine months of
fiscal 2005, Ciena recorded impairment losses of $0.1 million primarily related to excess research
and development test equipment classified as held for sale.
Investments
Cienas short-term and long-term investments are classified as available-for-sale and are
reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income. Realized gains or losses and declines in value determined to be other than
temporary, if any, on available-for-sale securities, are reported in other income or expense as
incurred.
6
Ciena also has certain other minority equity investments in privately held technology
companies. These investments are generally carried at cost because Ciena owns less than 20% of the
voting equity and does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over any of these
companies. These investments are inherently high risk as the market for technologies or products
manufactured by these companies are usually early stage at the time of the investment by Ciena and
such markets may never materialize or become significant. Ciena could lose its entire investment in
some or all of these companies. Ciena monitors these investments for impairment and makes
appropriate reductions in carrying values when necessary. During the nine months ended July 31,
2005, Ciena recorded a charge of $9.0 million from a decline in the fair value of certain equity
investments that was determined to be other than temporary.
Pro Forma Stock-Based Compensation
In December 2004, the FASB issued its final standard on accounting for share-based payments,
SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment, which addresses the accounting for share-based payment
transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for equity instruments
of the enterprise or liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprises equity
instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. The statement
eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and requires
instead that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. SFAS 123R becomes
effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 for Ciena. SFAS 123R permits early adoption for
interim or annual periods for which financial statements or interim reports have not been issued.
We expect the adoption of SFAS 123R will have a material effect on our financial position and
results of operations but will not affect our net cash flows.
Ciena has elected to continue to account for its stock-based compensation in accordance with
the provisions of APB 25 as interpreted by FASB Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain
Transactions Involving Stock Compensation (an Interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25) and will
implement SFAS 123R beginning the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
Had (i) compensation cost for Cienas stock option plans and employee stock purchase plan been
determined based on the Black-Scholes valuation method; and (ii) the fair value at the grant date
for awards in the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2004 and 2005 been determined
consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation as amended by
SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, Cienas net loss and
net loss per share for the third quarters and the nine months ended July 31, 2004 and 2005 would
have changed by the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net loss
as reported |
|
$ |
(141,467 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(294,391 |
) |
|
$ |
(182,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards, net
of related tax effects |
|
|
7,220 |
|
|
|
7,616 |
|
|
|
29,006 |
|
|
|
31,648 |
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included
in reported net income, net of related tax effects |
|
|
3,953 |
|
|
|
3,282 |
|
|
|
8,699 |
|
|
|
8,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss pro forma |
|
$ |
(144,734 |
) |
|
$ |
(55,361 |
) |
|
$ |
(314,698 |
) |
|
$ |
(205,667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and
diluted net loss per share as reported |
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.58 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and
diluted net loss per share pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above pro forma disclosures are not necessarily representative of the effects on
reported net income or loss for future years.
(3) RESTRUCTURING COSTS
Ciena has previously taken actions to align its workforce, facilities and operating costs with
business opportunities. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with
Exit or Disposal Activities, applicable to transactions initiated after December 31, 2002, Ciena
followed the guidance of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3 (EITF 94-3), Liability
Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other
Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring), for
restructuring charges. However, given the manner in which Ciena undertook such restructuring
activities, there have been no significant
7
differences in financial reporting. Ciena historically
has committed to a restructuring plan and has incurred the associated liability concurrently in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 146. The following table displays the activity and balances
of the restructuring reserve account for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce |
|
|
Consolidation of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
reduction |
|
|
excess facilities |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at October 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
1,446 |
|
|
$ |
79,937 |
|
|
$ |
81,383 |
|
Additional reserve recorded |
|
|
5,350 |
(a) |
|
|
447 |
(b) |
|
|
5,797 |
|
Adjustments to previous estimates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,448 |
(c) |
|
|
9,448 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(6,451 |
) |
|
|
(18,254 |
) |
|
|
(24,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
71,578 |
|
|
$ |
71,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
14,856 |
|
|
$ |
15,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current restructuring liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
56,722 |
|
|
$ |
56,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, Ciena recorded a charge of approximately $1.0
million related to a workforce reduction of approximately 21
employees. During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, Ciena recorded a charge of approximately $2.1 million
related to a workforce reduction of approximately 53 employees. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, Ciena recorded a charge of approximately $2.3 million
related to a workforce reduction of approximately 96 employees. |
|
(b) |
|
During the first and second quarter of fiscal 2005, Ciena incurred a charge of
approximately $0.3 million related to certain other costs associated with the closure of its
San Jose, CA facility on September 30, 2004. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, Ciena
recorded a charge of approximately $0.1 million related to the closure of one of its Kanata,
Canada facilities. |
|
(c) |
|
During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, Ciena reversed a charge of $0.1 million
related to an adjustment to vacated facility cost estimates. During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, Ciena recorded a charge of approximately $7.6
million related to a decrease in estimated future sublease payments for previously restructured
facilities. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, Ciena recorded a charge of approximately
$1.9 million related to a decrease in estimated future sublease payments for previously
restructured facilities. These adjustments to previously restructured facilities are due to the
continued excess supply of commercial property. |
(4) MARKETABLE DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
Cash, short-term and long-term investments are comprised of the following (in thousands):
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
$ |
320,379 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,737 |
|
|
$ |
318,642 |
|
Asset-backed obligations |
|
|
206,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
205,517 |
|
U.S. government obligations |
|
|
281,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
278,917 |
|
Money market funds |
|
|
313,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
313,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,121,389 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,744 |
|
|
$ |
1,116,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
313,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
313,569 |
|
Included in short-term investments |
|
|
606,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,353 |
|
|
|
602,888 |
|
Included in long-term investments |
|
|
201,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
200,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,121,389 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,744 |
|
|
$ |
1,116,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
$ |
403,178 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,059 |
|
|
$ |
402,119 |
|
Asset-backed obligations |
|
|
215,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
215,646 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
17,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
17,995 |
|
U.S. government obligations |
|
|
448,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
447,195 |
|
Money market funds |
|
|
202,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,288,066 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,488 |
|
|
$ |
1,285,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
202,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,623 |
|
Included in short-term investments |
|
|
754,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
753,251 |
|
Included in long-term investments |
|
|
330,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
926 |
|
|
|
329,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,288,066 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,488 |
|
|
$ |
1,285,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes maturities of debt investments (including restricted
investments) at July 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
Less than one year |
|
$ |
606,241 |
|
|
$ |
602,888 |
|
Due in 1-2 years |
|
|
201,572 |
|
|
|
200,188 |
|
Due in 2-5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
807,813 |
|
|
$ |
803,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
As of July 31, 2005, trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts,
included four customers who accounted for 15.3%, 10.9%, 10.4%, and 10.4% of net trade accounts
receivable, respectively. As of October 31, 2004, trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts, included three customers who accounted for 24.0%, 12.3% and 11.2% of net trade
accounts receivable, respectively.
Ciena performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally has not required
collateral or other forms of security from its customers. Ciena maintains an allowance for
potential losses on a specific identification basis. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005,
Ciena recorded a provision for doubtful accounts of $2.6 million relating to one customer. Cienas
allowance for doubtful accounts as of October 31, 2004 and July 31, 2005 was $1.0 and $3.3
million, respectively.
9
(6) INVENTORIES
Inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2004 |
|
|
July 31, 2005 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
19,591 |
|
|
$ |
21,542 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
3,833 |
|
|
|
3,293 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
46,123 |
|
|
|
48,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,547 |
|
|
|
73,479 |
|
Reserve for excess and
obsolescence |
|
|
(21,933 |
) |
|
|
(22,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,614 |
|
|
$ |
51,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ciena writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory by
the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based on assumptions
about future demand and market conditions. During the nine months ended July 31, 2005, Ciena
recorded a provision for excess inventory of $3.4 million, primarily related to excess inventory
due to a change in forecasted sales for certain products. The following is a summary of the change
in the reserve for excess inventory and obsolete inventory during the nine months ended July 31,
2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Reserve |
|
Reserve balance as of October 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
21,933 |
|
Provision for excess inventory, net |
|
|
3,396 |
|
Actual inventory scrapped |
|
|
(3,297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance as of July 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
22,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended July 31, 2004, Ciena recorded a provision for excess
inventory of $3.0 million,
primarily related to excess inventory due to a change in forecasted sales for certain
products. The following is a summary of the change in the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory
during the nine months ended July 31, 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Reserve |
|
Reserve balance as of October 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
23,093 |
|
Provision for excess inventory, net |
|
|
3,026 |
|
Actual inventory scrapped |
|
|
(4,825 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance as of July 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
21,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) EQUIPMENT, FURNITURE AND FIXTURES
Equipment, furniture and fixtures are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
$ |
259,809 |
|
|
$ |
178,008 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
38,064 |
|
|
|
33,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,873 |
|
|
|
211,741 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(247,336 |
) |
|
|
(179,259 |
) |
Construction-in-progress |
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,252 |
|
|
$ |
32,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2005, Ciena abandoned or disposed of certain idle assets that it determined
to have no future value. These assets had an aggregate original cost of $94.1 million and a
carrying value of $3.8 million. These assets were abandoned before the end of their estimated
useful life, and accordingly, Ciena recorded $3.8 million in accelerated depreciation expense during
the third quarter of 2005.
Ciena also recorded an impairment of $0.1 million, primarily related to research and
development equipment classified as held for sale in the first nine months of fiscal 2005. The
residual carrying value of these assets is insignificant.
10
(8) OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Other intangible assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2004 |
|
|
July 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Intangible |
|
Existing technology |
|
$ |
177,704 |
|
|
$ |
(43,076 |
) |
|
$ |
134,628 |
|
|
$ |
177,704 |
|
|
$ |
(64,389 |
) |
|
$ |
113,315 |
|
Patents and licenses |
|
|
46,670 |
|
|
|
(13,208 |
) |
|
|
33,462 |
|
|
|
46,670 |
|
|
|
(17,716 |
) |
|
|
28,954 |
|
Covenants not to compete,
outstanding purchase orders
and contracts |
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
(14,075 |
) |
|
|
39,925 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
(21,424 |
) |
|
|
32,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
278,374 |
|
|
$ |
(70,359 |
) |
|
$ |
208,015 |
|
|
$ |
278,374 |
|
|
$ |
(103,529 |
) |
|
$ |
174,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate amortization expense of other intangible assets was $22.4 million and $33.2
million for the nine months ended July 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively. The following table
represents the expected future amortization of other intangible assets as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2005 (remaining three months) |
|
$ |
10,621 |
|
2006 |
|
|
42,483 |
|
2007 |
|
|
42,483 |
|
2008 |
|
|
41,273 |
|
2009 |
|
|
21,054 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
16,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
174,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
(9) OTHER BALANCE SHEET DETAILS
Other long-term assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Maintenance spares inventory, net |
|
$ |
18,959 |
|
|
$ |
12,304 |
|
Deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
9,841 |
|
|
|
7,117 |
|
Investments in privately held companies |
|
|
21,592 |
|
|
|
7,722 |
|
Other |
|
|
9,804 |
|
|
|
10,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
60,196 |
|
|
$ |
37,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Warranty |
|
$ |
30,189 |
|
|
$ |
27,215 |
|
Accrued compensation, payroll related tax and benefits |
|
|
23,531 |
|
|
|
28,689 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
6,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
15,856 |
|
|
|
16,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,045 |
|
|
$ |
72,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the activity in Cienas accrued warranty for the nine
months ended July 31, 2004 and 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end |
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
Balance |
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
of period |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
36,189 |
|
|
|
7,179 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
(12,212 |
) |
|
$ |
32,156 |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
30,189 |
|
|
|
7,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,520 |
) |
|
$ |
27,215 |
|
11
Deferred revenue (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Products |
|
$ |
8,578 |
|
|
$ |
18,694 |
|
Services |
|
|
28,998 |
|
|
|
26,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred revenue |
|
|
37,576 |
|
|
|
45,677 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(21,566 |
) |
|
|
(31,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
$ |
16,010 |
|
|
$ |
14,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10) CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
On February 9, 2001, Ciena completed a public offering of 3.75% convertible notes, in an
aggregate principal amount of $690 million, due February 1, 2008. Interest is payable on February
1st and August 1st of each year. The notes may be converted into shares of
Cienas common stock at any time before their maturity or their prior
redemption or repurchase by Ciena. The conversion rate is 9.5808 shares per each $1,000
principal amount of notes, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, Ciena purchased $41.2 million of the outstanding
3.75% convertible notes for $36.9 million in open market transactions. Ciena recorded a gain on the
extinguishment of debt in the amount of $3.9 million, which consists of the $4.3 million gain from
the repurchase of the notes less a write-off of $0.4 million of associated debt issuance costs.
Ciena has the option to redeem all or a portion of the notes that have not been previously
converted at the following redemption prices (expressed as percentage of principle amount):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption |
|
Period |
|
Price |
|
|
Beginning on February 1, 2005 and ending on January 31, 2006 |
|
|
101.607 |
% |
Beginning on February 1, 2006 and ending on January 31, 2007 |
|
|
101.071 |
% |
Beginning on February 1, 2007 and ending on January 31, 2008 |
|
|
100.536 |
% |
On July 31, 2005, the fair market value of the remaining $648.8 million of 3.75%
convertible notes was $578.2 million. The fair value is based on a quoted market price for the
notes.
On December 19, 2003, Ciena purchased the remaining $48.2 million of the outstanding ONI
Systems Corp. 5.0% convertible subordinated notes. Ciena paid $49.2 million for notes with a
cumulative accreted book value of $41.0 million, which resulted in a loss on early extinguishment
of debt of $8.2 million.
(11) LOSS PER SHARE CALCULATION
Basic EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
(excluding restricted stock subject to repurchase). Diluted EPS is computed by combining shares
outstanding for purposes of basic EPS with shares underlying stock options, warrants, restricted
stock, restricted stock units and Cienas 3.75% convertible notes determined using the treasury
stock method.
Weighted average number of common shares underlying stock options, warrants, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, and Cienas 3.75% convertible notes totaled (i) approximately 57.5 million
and 63.6 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2004 and 2005, respectively, and (ii)
approximately 42.3 million and 65.7 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and 2005,
respectively. These shares were not included in the computation of diluted EPS as the effect would
be anti-dilutive.
12
(12) COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The components of comprehensive loss for the quarters and nine months ended July 31, 2004 and
2005 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(141,467 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(294,391 |
) |
|
$ |
(182,829 |
) |
Change in unrealized loss on available-
for-sale securities, net of tax |
|
|
(2,702 |
) |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
(5,906 |
) |
|
|
(2,256 |
) |
Change in accumulated translation
adjustments |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(144,195 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(300,399 |
) |
|
$ |
(185,285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13) SEGMENT REPORTING
Cienas geographic distribution of revenue for the quarters and nine months ended July 31,
2004 and 2005 were as follows (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
61,231 |
|
|
|
81.0 |
|
|
$ |
89,357 |
|
|
|
80.9 |
|
|
$ |
156,547 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
|
|
$ |
248,216 |
|
|
|
80.3 |
|
International |
|
|
14,358 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
21,123 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
60,155 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
60,858 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
75,589 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
110,480 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
216,702 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
309,074 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
During the quarters and nine months ended July 31, 2004 and 2005, customers who each
accounted for at least 10% of Cienas revenue during the respective periods were as follows (in
thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
Customer A |
|
$ |
12,458 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
$ |
13,780 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
$ |
40,284 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
$ |
37,882 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Customer B |
|
|
7,933 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,395 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Customer C |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,802 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,739 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
20,391 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
$ |
28,582 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
$ |
40,284 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
$ |
107,016 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A Denotes recognized less than 10% of total revenue for the period |
|
* |
Denotes % of total revenue |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth our operating segment
revenues for the quarters and nine months ended July 31, 2004 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSG |
|
$ |
42,240 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
$ |
64,641 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
$ |
152,635 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
$ |
182,638 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
|
DNG |
|
|
7,138 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
6,757 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
13,839 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
28,302 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
BBG |
|
|
14,962 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
26,050 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
14,962 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
60,426 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
GNS |
|
|
11,249 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
13,032 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
35,266 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
37,708 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenue |
|
$ |
75,589 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
110,480 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
216,702 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
309,074 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
Segment profit (loss) is determined based on internal performance measures used by the
Chief Executive Officer to assess the performance of each operating segment in a given period. In
connection with that assessment, the Chief Executive Officer excludes the following other
non-performance items: corporate selling and marketing; corporate general and administrative costs;
stock compensation; amortization of intangibles; in-process research and development; restructuring
costs; long-lived asset impairment; recovery of sale, export and use taxes; provisions or recovery
of doubtful accounts; accelerated amortization of leaseholds; interest income, interest expense,
equity investment gains or losses, gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, and provisions for
income taxes.
13
The
table below (in thousands) sets forth our operating segment profit (loss) and the reconciliation to
consolidated net loss for the quarters and nine months ended July 31, 2004 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Segment profit (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSG |
|
$ |
(29,923 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,050 |
) |
|
$ |
(94,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,343 |
) |
DNG |
|
|
(2,197 |
) |
|
|
(2,103 |
) |
|
|
(9,490 |
) |
|
|
429 |
|
BBG |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
3,221 |
|
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
(820 |
) |
GNS |
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
3,589 |
|
|
|
5,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
segment profit (loss) |
|
$ |
(30,552 |
) |
|
$ |
1,332 |
|
|
$ |
(100,302 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-performance items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate selling and marketing |
|
|
(25,377 |
) |
|
|
(25,597 |
) |
|
|
(69,402 |
) |
|
|
(70,895 |
) |
Corporate general and administrative |
|
|
(6,969 |
) |
|
|
(9,340 |
) |
|
|
(20,052 |
) |
|
|
(25,538 |
) |
Stock compensation costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
(1,860 |
) |
|
|
(2,195 |
) |
|
|
(5,473 |
) |
|
|
(4,048 |
) |
Selling and marketing |
|
|
(1,214 |
) |
|
|
(934 |
) |
|
|
(2,147 |
) |
|
|
(4,257 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(879 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
(1,079 |
) |
|
|
(505 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(12,667 |
) |
|
|
(9,653 |
) |
|
|
(19,458 |
) |
|
|
(30,268 |
) |
In-process research and development |
|
|
(30,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
(13,547 |
) |
|
|
(4,355 |
) |
|
|
(22,125 |
) |
|
|
(15,245 |
) |
Long-lived asset impairments |
|
|
(7,217 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(7,217 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
Recovery of sale, export, use tax liability and
payments |
|
|
3,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Provision) benefit for doubtful accounts, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,604 |
) |
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
(2,604 |
) |
Accelerated amortization of leasehold |
|
|
(12,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest and other financial charges, net |
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
(9,921 |
) |
|
|
(4,665 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss |
|
$ |
(141,467 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(294,391 |
) |
|
$ |
(182,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14) CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
On October 3, 2000, Stanford University and Litton Systems filed a complaint in the United
States District Court for the Central District of California alleging that optical fiber amplifiers
incorporated into Cienas products infringe U.S. Patent No. 4,859,016 (the 016 Patent). The
complaint seeks injunctive relief, royalties and damages. On October 10, 2003, the court stayed the case
pending final resolution of matters before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO),
including a request for and disposition of a reexamination of the 016 Patent. On October 16, 2003
and November 2, 2004, the PTO granted reexaminations of the 016 Patent, resulting in a
continuation of the stay of the case. Ciena believes that it has valid defenses
to the lawsuit and intends to defend it vigorously in the event the
stay of the case is lifted.
As a result of our merger with ONI Systems Corp. in June 2002, we became a defendant in a
securities class action lawsuit. Beginning in August 2001, a number of substantially identical
class action complaints alleging violations of the federal securities laws were filed in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York. These complaints name ONI, Hugh C.
Martin, ONIs former chairman, president and chief executive officer; Chris A. Davis, ONIs former
executive vice president, chief financial officer and administrative officer; and certain
underwriters of ONIs initial public offering as defendants. The complaints were consolidated into
a single action, and a consolidated amended complaint was filed on April 24, 2002. The amended
complaint alleges, among other things, that the underwriter defendants violated the securities laws
by failing to disclose alleged compensation arrangements (such as undisclosed commissions or stock
stabilization practices) in the initial public offerings registration statement and by engaging in
manipulative practices to artificially inflate the price of ONIs common stock after the initial
public offering. The amended complaint also alleges that ONI and the named former officers violated
the securities laws on the basis of an alleged failure to disclose the underwriters alleged
compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. No specific amount of damages has been
claimed. Similar complaints have been filed against more than 300 other issuers that have had
initial public offerings since 1998, and all of these
14
actions have been included in a single
coordinated proceeding. Mr. Martin and Ms. Davis have been dismissed from the action without
prejudice pursuant to a tolling agreement. In July 2004, following mediated settlement
negotiations, the plaintiffs, the issuer defendants (including Ciena), and their insurers entered
into a settlement agreement, whereby the plaintiffs cases against the issuers are to be dismissed.
The plaintiffs and issuer defendants subsequently moved the court for preliminary approval of the
settlement agreement, which motion was opposed by the underwriter defendants. On February 15, 2005,
the district court granted the motion for preliminary approval of the settlement agreement, subject
to certain modifications to the proposed bar order, and directed the parties to submit a revised
settlement agreement reflecting its opinion. If the parties are able to agree upon the required
modifications, and such modifications are acceptable to the court, notice will be given to all
class members of the settlement, a fairness hearing will be held and, if the court determines
that the settlement is fair to the class members, the settlement will be approved.
On January 18, 2005, Ciena filed a complaint in the United States District Court, Eastern District
of Texas, Marshall Division against Nortel Networks, Inc., Nortel Networks Corporation and Nortel
Networks Limited (collectively, Nortel), which complaint was subsequently amended. Cienas
amended complaint charges Nortel with infringement of nine patents related to Cienas
communications networking systems and technology. Ciena seeks to enjoin Nortels infringing
activities and recover damages caused by such infringement. On March 14, 2005, Nortel filed an
answer to Cienas complaint and a counterclaim against Ciena, each of which have subsequently been
amended. Nortels amended counterclaim charges Ciena with infringement of 13 patents related to
Nortels communications networking
systems and technology, including certain of Nortels SONET, ATM and VLAN systems and technology.
Nortels counterclaim seeks injunctive relief and damages. This matter is currently scheduled for
trial in June 2006.
In addition to the matters described above, we are subject to various legal proceedings,
claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these
matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these
matters will have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Some of the statements contained, or incorporated by reference, in this quarterly report
discuss future events or expectations, contain projections of results of operations or financial
condition or state other forward-looking information. These statements are subject to known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause the actual results to differ
materially from those contemplated by the statements. Cienas forward-looking information is
based on various factors and was derived using numerous assumptions. In some cases, you can
identify these forward-looking statements by words like may, will, should, expects,
plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, potential or continue or the
negative of those words and other comparable words. You should be aware that these statements only
reflect our current predictions and beliefs. Actual events or results may differ materially.
Important factors that could cause our actual results to be materially different from the
forward-looking statements are disclosed throughout this report, particularly under the heading
Risk Factors below. Investors should review these risk factors and the rest of this quarterly
report in combination with the more detailed description of our business in our annual report on
Form 10-K, which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 9, 2004, for a
more complete understanding of the risks associated with an investment in Cienas common stock.
Ciena undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements.
Overview
Ciena Corporation supplies application-focused communications networking equipment, software
and services to communications service providers, cable operators, governments and enterprises.
Ciena is a network specialist, focused on optimizing access and edge networks for broadband
communication, enhancing enterprise data services and evolving network infrastructure to support
new services through automation and convergence. Ciena leverages its core competencies in optical
networking, data networking and broadband access to develop and deliver solutions that address its
customers most important networking problems. Our solutions enable customers to gain a competitive
advantage by increasing the functionality of their networks and reducing their costs of
transporting data, voice and video.
In response to dramatic changes in the market for communications networking equipment over the
last several years, we have sought to expand our addressable market, diversify our customer base
and broaden our networking solutions portfolio. Our strategy has been to build upon our historical
expertise in core networking and position
15
Ciena to take advantage of new market opportunities
arising as communications service providers, cable operators, governments and enterprises invest in
next-generation equipment. We have sought to achieve these goals through a combination of internal
development and acquisitions, and by creating new strategic relationships and distribution
arrangements to reach enterprise and government customers. Simultaneous with these efforts, we have
sought to align our workforce, facilities and operating expenses with the market opportunities
available to us, balancing our research and development investment with cost controls and prudent
cash management.
Our financial results, product development announcements and cost reduction activities during
the third quarter of fiscal 2005 reflect the effects of this strategy. Revenue increased to $110.5
million, representing a 6.4% increase from the second quarter of fiscal 2005 and a 46.2% increase
from the third quarter of fiscal 2004. Third quarter sequential revenue growth was driven
primarily by increased sales of our broadband access products and metro transport and switching
products. Third quarter broadband access product revenue primarily consisted of sales of our CNX-5
Broadband DSL System, which offers communications service providers a simple line card replacement
to deploy DSL services from their existing legacy network infrastructure without reducing plain old
telephone service (POTS) port density. Our CNX-5 sales are significantly dependent upon the level
of customer demand for DSL service offerings from regional bell operating companies (RBOCs) in
North America and are affected by changes in DSL promotion and pricing. The mix of products that
have driven our revenue growth for the past several quarters has varied and we expect this mix of
products to continue to fluctuate on a quarterly basis.
Our third quarter financial results also reflect our second consecutive quarter of progress in
the area of gross margin. Our product gross margin increased sequentially to 35.6% from 28.1% in
the second quarter of fiscal 2005. The increase was primarily due to favorable product mix during the quarter, but margins also
benefited from product-related cost reductions. We continue to focus on aggressive cost reductions
across all product lines.
During the third quarter, we continued to take steps to reduce our ongoing operating expense. In
May, we effected a headcount reduction of 96 employees, most employed in our Kanata, Ontario
facility. We also made progress toward establishing a development operation in India, through which
we intend to further reduce operating costs and leverage offshore resources. We intend to continue
to pursue alternatives to reduce our general and administrative, sales and marketing and research
and development costs.
During the third quarter, we repurchased approximately $41.2 million in principal amount of
our outstanding 3.75% convertible notes, due February 1, 2008, in open market transactions. At July
31, 2005, an aggregate principal amount of approximately $648.8 million remained outstanding. We
used $36.9 million of our cash to effect these repurchases during the quarter, which resulted in a
savings of approximately $4.3 million in outstanding principal on the notes. We intend to continue
to evaluate and pursue alternatives that enable us to exercise prudent cash management and achieve
cost savings relating to the repayment of our outstanding convertible notes.
Ciena believes network adaptability is emerging as a key concern for enterprises, and as a
competitive differentiator for service providers, as both look to evolve their networks to support
and deliver new service offerings. During the third quarter, we announced our FlexSelect
Architecture, a standards-based, service oriented network architecture that facilitates flexible
and adaptable management of network services. We also introduced two new products based on this
network vision: the CN 4200 Advanced Services Platform and CoreStream® Regional. The CN
4200 is a multi-service transport and aggregation platform that provides any service on any port
at any time via software programmable hardware that operates down to the port level. It enables
cost-effective transition from time division multiplexing (TDM) to service-selectable packet
networks. CoreStream Regional is an extension of our CoreStream Agility Optical Transmission System
and provides customers with a cost-effective option to provide wavelength division multiplexing
(DWDM) to metro and regional core networks with moderate capacity and distance requirements. Both
products illustrate our flexible, adaptable, service oriented approach to the development of next
generation products as well as our commitment to prudent development efforts that enable us to
achieve gross margin improvement and compete more effectively in the global marketplace.
Fiscal 2005 has witnessed a considerable increase in consolidation activity among U.S.
communications service providers. This activity includes proposed mergers between Verizon and MCI,
and between SBC and AT&T, all of which have been significant customers during prior periods.
Mergers of large carriers will have a major impact in shaping the future of the telecommunications
industry, our historical customer base for our products. These mergers also have the effect of
further reducing the number of potential communications service provider customers seeking to
purchase networking equipment from vendors and continuing to concentrate customer purchasing power.
It is too soon to determine the near-term and long-term effects, if any, that these proposed
consolidations will have on our business.
16
As of July 31, 2005, Ciena had 1,497 employees, a net reduction of 154 employees from the
1,651 employees on October 31, 2004 and a net reduction of 246 employees from the 1,743 employees
on July 31, 2004.
Results of Operations
Three months ended July 31, 2004 compared to three months ended July 31, 2005
Revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit
Cost of goods sold consists of component costs, direct compensation costs, warranty and other
contractual obligations, royalties, license fees, direct technical support costs, cost of excess
and obsolete inventory and overhead related to manufacturing, technical support and engineering,
furnishing and installation (EF&I) operations.
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, cost
of goods sold and gross profit from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the third quarter of fiscal
2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
64,340 |
|
|
|
85.1 |
|
|
$ |
97,448 |
|
|
|
88.2 |
|
|
$ |
33,108 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
|
Services |
|
|
11,249 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
13,032 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
75,589 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
110,480 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
34,891 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
48,069 |
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
62,756 |
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
14,687 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
Services |
|
|
8,723 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
10,095 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold |
|
|
56,792 |
|
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
72,851 |
|
|
|
65.9 |
|
|
|
16,059 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
18,797 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
$ |
37,629 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
$ |
18,832 |
|
|
|
100.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in product
revenue, product cost of goods sold and product gross profit from the third quarter of fiscal 2004
to the third quarter of fiscal 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
64,340 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
97,488 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
33,148 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
|
Product cost of goods sold |
|
|
48,069 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
62,756 |
|
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
|
14,687 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product gross profit |
|
$ |
16,271 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
$ |
34,732 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
$ |
18,461 |
|
|
|
113.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of product revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in service
revenue, service cost of goods sold and service gross profit (loss) from the third quarter of
fiscal 2004 to the third quarter of fiscal 2005.
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Service revenue |
|
$ |
11,249 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
13,032 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
Service cost of goods sold |
|
|
8,723 |
|
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
|
10,095 |
|
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service gross profit |
|
$ |
2,526 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,937 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of service revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in
geographic distribution of revenues from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the third quarter of
fiscal 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
%* |
|
2005 |
|
%* |
|
(decrease) |
|
%** |
Domestic
|
|
$ |
61,231 |
|
|
|
81.0 |
|
|
$ |
89,357 |
|
|
|
80.9 |
|
|
$ |
28,126 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
|
International
|
|
|
14,358 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
21,123 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
6,765 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
75,589 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
110,480 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
34,891 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
During the third quarter of fiscal 2004 and third quarter of fiscal 2005, certain
customers each accounted for at least 10% of our revenues during the respective periods as follows
(in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
Customer A |
|
$ |
12,458 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
$ |
13,780 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
Customer B |
|
|
7,933 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer C |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,802 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
20,391 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
$ |
28,582 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A Denotes revenue recognized less than 10% of total revenue
for the period |
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
Revenue
|
|
|
Product revenue increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the third
quarter of fiscal 2005 due to increased sales of our transport and switching products and
broadband access systems. |
|
|
|
|
Domestic revenue increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the third
quarter of fiscal 2005 primarily due to increased domestic sales of our transport and
switching products and broadband access systems. |
|
|
|
|
International revenue decreased from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the
third quarter of fiscal 2005 primarily due to decreased international sales of our
transport and switching products. |
Gross profit
|
|
|
Gross profit as a percentage of total revenue and gross profit on products as
a percentage of product revenue both increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to
the third quarter of fiscal 2005 largely due to favorable product mix during the quarter
and cost reductions across multiple product lines. |
Operating expenses
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating
expenses from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the third quarter of fiscal 2005.
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
57,762 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
|
|
$ |
32,619 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
$ |
(25,143 |
) |
|
|
(43.5 |
) |
Selling and marketing |
|
|
29,468 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
29,275 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
6,969 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
9,340 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
Stock compensation costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(726 |
) |
|
|
(82.6 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
12,667 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
9,653 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
(3,014 |
) |
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
In-process research and development |
|
|
30,200 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,200 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Restructuring costs |
|
|
13,547 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
(9,192 |
) |
|
|
(67.9 |
) |
Long-lived asset impairments |
|
|
7,217 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,242 |
) |
|
|
(100.3 |
) |
Recovery of sale, export, use tax
liabilities and payments |
|
|
(3,457 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,457 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Provision for doubtful accounts, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
158,326 |
|
|
|
209.5 |
|
|
$ |
91,103 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
$ |
(67,223 |
) |
|
|
(42.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
|
|
|
Research and development expense decreased from the third quarter of fiscal
2004 to the third quarter of fiscal 2005 due to reductions in accelerated leasehold
amortization, employee-related costs, consulting fees, depreciation expense and
facility-related costs. Research and development expense during the third quarter of
fiscal 2004 includes $12.5 million of accelerated leasehold amortization due to the
closing of our San Jose, CA facility in September 2004. Research and development expense
during the third quarter of 2005 includes $1.5 million of accelerated depreciation related
to our decision to abandon or dispose of certain idle assets determined to have no future
value. |
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expense decreased slightly from the third quarter of
fiscal 2004 to the third quarter
of fiscal 2005 due to reductions in employee-related costs offset by increases in
depreciation expense and tradeshow and marketing activities. Selling and marketing expense
during the third quarter of 2005 includes $2.0 million of accelerated depreciation related
to our decision to abandon or dispose of certain idle assets determined to have no future
value. |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense increased from the third quarter of fiscal
2004 to the third quarter of fiscal 2005 primarily due to increases in consulting expense
related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, expenses related to legal services, and information
system costs partially offset by a decrease in
employee-related costs. |
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation costs decreased from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to
the third quarter of fiscal 2005 due to a reduction in staffing levels, which resulted in
a lower level of unvested stock options and restricted stock. As of July 31, 2005, the
balance of deferred stock compensation, presented as a reduction of stockholders equity,
was $2.9 million. With the adoption of SFAS 123R, we expect our reported stock
compensation cost will materially increase beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets costs decreased from the third quarter of
fiscal 2004 to the third quarter of fiscal 2005 primarily because of intangible assets,
such as non-compete agreements and purchase commitments, were fully amortized in previous
periods. |
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development (IPR&D) costs represents the estimated
value of purchased in-process technology that had not reached technological feasibility
and had no alternative future use at the time of the acquisition. In the third quarter of
fiscal 2004 we recorded $25.0 million and $5.2 million of IPR&D from our Catena and
Internet Photonics acquisitions, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs incurred during the third quarter of 2005 were related to
work force reductions of 96 employees and adjustments to previously restructured
facilities due to the continued excess supply of commercial property. These workforce
reductions were taken as part of our efforts to reduce our costs. We expect to incur
additional restructuring costs in future periods. |
19
|
|
|
Long-lived assets impairments for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 were
primarily related to the impairment of research and development equipment, which was
classified as held for sale. During the third quarter of 2005, we recorded a credit
because we sold some of this equipment for an amount in excess of its carrying value. |
|
|
|
|
Recovery of sales, export, use tax liabilities and payments during the first
nine months of fiscal 2004 was due to the resolution of a use tax audit related to assets
acquired from ONI. |
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts, net during the third quarter of fiscal 2005
was $2.6 million. We maintain an allowance for potential losses on a specific
identification basis. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we recorded a provision for
doubtful accounts of $2.6 million relating to one customer. |
Other items
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items
from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the third quarter of fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
$ |
4,936 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
6,765 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,829 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
6,469 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
6,406 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Loss on equity investments, net |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,708 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,508 |
|
|
|
754.0 |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,882 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
3,882 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(119 |
) |
|
|
(58.0 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2004
to the third quarter of fiscal 2005 primarily due to higher rates of return on our
investments partially offset by the impact of lower cash and investment balances. |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased slightly from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to
the third quarter of fiscal 2005 due to the decrease in our debt obligations between the
two periods resulting from our purchase of $41.2 million of the Ciena 3.75% convertible
notes during the third quarter of fiscal 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Loss on equity investments, net reflects losses due to declines in the value
of our investments in privately
held technology companies that were determined to be other than temporary in the third
quarters of fiscal 2004 and 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt reflects the purchase of $41.2 million of our
outstanding 3.75% convertible notes for $36.9 million. We recorded a gain in the amount of
$3.9, which consists of the $4.3 million gain from the repurchase of the notes less a
write-off of $0.4 million of associated debt issuance costs. |
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 and the third
quarter of fiscal 2005 was primarily attributable to foreign tax related to our foreign
operations. We did not record a tax benefit for Cienas domestic losses during either
period. We will continue to maintain a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax
assets until sufficient evidence exists to support its reversal. |
Nine months ended July 31, 2004 compared to nine months ended July 31, 2005
Revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, cost
of goods sold and gross profit for the nine months ended July 31, 2004 and 2005:
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
181,436 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
$ |
271,366 |
|
|
|
87.8 |
|
|
$ |
89,930 |
|
|
|
49.6 |
|
Services |
|
|
35,266 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
37,708 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
2,442 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue |
|
$ |
216,702 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
309,074 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
92,372 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
138,918 |
|
|
|
64.1 |
|
|
|
189,447 |
|
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
50,529 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
Services |
|
|
30,212 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
30,601 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods sold |
|
|
169,130 |
|
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
|
220,048 |
|
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
50,918 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
47,572 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
$ |
89,026 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
$ |
41,454 |
|
|
|
87.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in product
revenue, product cost of goods sold and product gross profit for the nine months ended July 31,
2004 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
Increase
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
181,436 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
271,366 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
89,930 |
|
|
|
49.6 |
|
Product cost of goods sold |
|
|
138,918 |
|
|
|
76.6 |
|
|
|
189,447 |
|
|
|
69.8 |
|
|
|
50,529 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product gross profit |
|
$ |
42,518 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
$ |
81,919 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
$ |
39,401 |
|
|
|
92.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of product revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in service
revenue, service cost of goods sold and service gross profit for the nine months ended July 31,
2004 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Service revenue |
|
$ |
35,266 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
37,708 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,442 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Service cost of goods
sold |
|
|
30,212 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
30,601 |
|
|
|
81.2 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service gross profit |
|
$ |
5,054 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
$ |
7,107 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,053 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of service revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in
geographic distribution of revenues for the nine months ended July 31, 2004 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
156,547 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
|
|
$ |
248,216 |
|
|
|
80.3 |
|
|
$ |
91,669 |
|
|
|
58.6 |
|
International |
|
|
60,155 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
60,858 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
216,702 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
309,074 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
92,372 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
21
During for the nine months ended July 31, 2004 and 2005, certain customers each accounted for
at least 10% of our revenues during the respective periods as follows (in thousands, except
percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
Customer A |
|
$ |
40,284 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
$ |
37,882 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Customer B |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,395 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Customer C |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,739 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
40,284 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
$ |
107,016 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Denotes revenue recognized less than 10% of total revenue for the period |
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
Revenue
|
|
|
Product revenue increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to the
first nine months of fiscal 2005 due to sales of broadband access systems obtained from
our May 2004 acquisition of Catena Networks, and increased sales of our data networking
products and transport and switching products. As a result of the timing of our
acquisition of Catena and IPI, product revenue for 2004 reflects only one quarter of
revenue from these acquired products. |
|
|
|
|
Service revenue increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to the
first nine months of fiscal 2005 due to an increase in the sale of training and managed
services. |
|
|
|
|
Domestic revenue increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to the
first nine months of fiscal 2005 primarily due to sales of broadband access systems
obtained from our May 2004 acquisition of Catena Networks, and increased domestic sales of
our data networking products and transport and switching products. |
|
|
|
|
International revenue decreased from the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to
the first nine months of fiscal 2005 primarily due to decreased international sales of our
core optical switches. |
Gross profit
|
|
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue and gross profit on products as a
percentage of product revenue both increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to
the first nine months of fiscal 2005 largely due to favorable product mix and product cost
reductions. |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit on services as a percentage of services revenue increased from
the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to the first nine months of fiscal 2005 largely due
to reduced service overhead costs. |
Operating expenses
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating
expenses for the nine months ended July 31, 2004 to the nine months ended July 31, 2005.
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
151,418 |
|
|
|
69.9 |
|
|
$ |
101,036 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
$ |
(50,382 |
) |
|
|
(33.3 |
) |
Selling and marketing |
|
|
80,011 |
|
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
82,440 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
20,052 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
25,538 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
5,486 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
Stock compensation costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
5,473 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4,048 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(1,425 |
) |
|
|
(26.0 |
) |
Selling and marketing |
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
4,257 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(574 |
) |
|
|
(53.2 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
19,458 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
30,268 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
10,810 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
30,200 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,200 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Restructuring costs |
|
|
22,125 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
15,245 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
(6,880 |
) |
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
Long-lived asset impairments |
|
|
7,217 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,083 |
) |
|
|
(98.1 |
) |
Recovery of sales, export, use tax
liabilities and payments |
|
|
(5,388 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,388 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful
accounts, net |
|
|
(2,794 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
5,398 |
|
|
|
(193.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
330,998 |
|
|
|
152.7 |
|
|
$ |
266,075 |
|
|
|
86.1 |
|
|
$ |
(64,923 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
|
|
|
Research and development expense decreased from the first nine months of
fiscal 2004 to the first nine months of fiscal 2005 due to reductions in accelerated
leasehold amortization, depreciation expense, employee-related costs, consulting expense,
facility related costs and prototype material expense. For the nine months ended July 31,
2004, research and development expenses includes $14.2 million of accelerated leasehold
amortization due to the closing of our San Jose, CA facility in September 2004. |
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expense increased slightly from the first nine months of
fiscal 2004 to the first nine months of fiscal 2005 due to higher costs related to
tradeshow and marketing activities and increased travel expenditures, partially offset by
reductions in depreciation expense. |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense increased from the first nine months of
fiscal 2004 to the first nine months of fiscal 2005 primarily due to increases in
consulting expense related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, expenses related to legal
services, and information system costs. |
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation costs decreased from the first nine months of fiscal 2004
to the first nine months of fiscal 2005 due to the reduction in staffing levels, which
resulted in a lower level of unvested stock options and restricted stock. As of July 31,
2005, the balance of deferred stock compensation, presented as a reduction of
stockholders equity, was $2.9 million. With the adoption of SFAS 123R, we expect our
reported stock compensation cost will materially increase beginning in our first quarter
of fiscal 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets costs increased from the first nine months
of fiscal 2004 to the first nine months of fiscal 2005 due to higher amounts of purchased
intangible assets, such as developed technology and customer relationships resulting from
our acquisitions of Catena Networks and Internet Photonics in May 2004. |
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development (IPR&D) costs represents the estimated
value of purchased in-process technology that had not reached technological feasibility
and had no alternative future use at the time of the acquisition. In the third quarter of
fiscal 2004 we recorded $25.0 million and $5.2 million of IPR&D from our Catena and
Internet Photonics acquisitions, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs incurred during the first nine months of fiscal 2005 were
related to work force reductions of approximately 170 employees and an adjustment to
previously restructured facilities due to the continued excess supply of commercial
property. These workforce reductions were taken as part of our efforts to reduce our
costs. We expect to incur additional restructuring costs during future periods. |
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets impairment charges for the first nine months of fiscal 2005
were primarily related to the impairment of research and development equipment, which was
classified as held for sale. |
|
|
|
|
Recovery of sales, export, use tax liabilities and payments during the first
nine months of fiscal 2004 was due to the resolution of a use tax audit related to assets
acquired from ONI. |
23
|
|
|
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts, net during the first nine
months of fiscal 2004 was related primarily to the payment of an amount due from a
customer, from which payment was previously deemed doubtful due to the customers
financial condition. Ciena maintains an allowance for potential losses on a specific
identification basis. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, Ciena recorded a provision
for doubtful accounts of $2.6 million relating to one customer. |
Other items
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items
for the nine months ended July 31, 2004 to the nine months ended July 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
%* |
|
2005 |
|
%* |
|
(decrease) |
|
%** |
Interest and other income, net |
|
$ |
18,228 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
19,787 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,559 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
20,326 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
$ |
19,348 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
(978 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
Gain (loss) on equity investments, net |
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
(8,986 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,379 |
) |
|
|
(2,386.5 |
) |
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt |
|
$ |
(8,216 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
$ |
3,882 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
12,098 |
|
|
|
(147.2 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
1,044 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net increased slightly from the first nine months
of fiscal 2004 to the first nine months of fiscal 2005 primarily because of higher rates
of return on investments. |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased from the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to the
first nine months of fiscal 2005 due to the decrease in our debt obligations between the
two periods resulting from our repurchase of the remaining outstanding ONI 5.0%
convertible subordinated notes during fiscal 2004 and $41.2 million in principal amount of
our 3.75% convertible notes during the third quarter of fiscal 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on equity investments, net during the first nine months of fiscal
2004 includes a cash payment of $1.6 million received for an investment in a private
company that had been previously written down to a value of $1.0 million partially offset
by a $0.2 million write-down of an investment. The resulting $0.4 million was recorded as
a gain on equity investments. During the first nine months of fiscal 2005, we recorded a
$9.0 million loss due to a decline in value of our investments in privately held
technology companies that was determined to be other than temporary. |
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt during the first nine months of fiscal
2004 resulted from our repurchase of the ONI 5.0% convertible subordinated notes. During
the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we purchased $41.2 million of our 3.75% outstanding
convertible notes for $36.9 million. We recorded a gain on the extinguishment of debt in
the amount of $3.9 million, which consists of the $4.3 million gain from the repurchase of
the notes less a write-off of $0.4 million of associated debt issuance costs. |
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes for the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and the
first nine months of fiscal 2005 was primarily attributable to foreign tax related to our
foreign operations. We did not record a tax benefit for our domestic losses during either
period. We will continue to maintain a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax
assets until sufficient evidence exists to support its reversal. |
Summary of Operating Segments
Three months ended July 31, 2004 compared to three months ended July 31, 2005
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating
segment revenues from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the third quarter of fiscal 2005 for our
four operating segments: Transport and Switching Group (TSG); Data Networking Group (DNG);
Broadband Access Group (BBG); and the Global Networking Services Group (GNS).
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSG |
|
$ |
42,240 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
$ |
64,641 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
$ |
22,401 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
DNG |
|
|
7,138 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
6,757 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
BBG |
|
|
14,962 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
26,050 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
11,088 |
|
|
|
74.1 |
|
GNS |
|
|
11,249 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
13,032 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenue |
|
$ |
75,589 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
110,480 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
34,891 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
|
|
|
TSG revenue increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the third
quarter of fiscal 2005 primarily due to increased sales of core optical switches and our
long-haul transport products. |
|
|
|
|
BBG revenue increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the third
quarter of fiscal 2005 primarily
due to increased sales our CNX-5 Broadband DSL System. |
|
|
|
|
GNS revenue increased from the third quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of
2005 primarily due to increased sales of training and managed services. |
Segment profit (loss) is determined based on internal performance measures used by the Chief
Executive Officer to assess the performance of each operating segment in a given period. In
connection with that assessment, the Chief Executive Officer excludes the following other
non-performance items: corporate selling and marketing; corporate general and administrative costs;
stock compensation; amortization of intangibles; in-process research and development; restructuring
costs; long-lived asset impairment; recovery of sale, export and use taxes; provisions or recovery
of doubtful accounts; accelerated amortization of leaseholds; interest income, interest expense,
equity investment gains or losses, gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, and provisions for
income taxes.
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our segment
profit (loss) and the reconciliation to consolidated net loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2004
to the third quarter of fiscal 2005.
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Segment profit (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSG |
|
$ |
(29,923 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,050 |
) |
|
$ |
27,873 |
|
|
|
(93.1 |
) |
DNG |
|
|
(2,197 |
) |
|
|
(2,103 |
) |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
BBG |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
3,221 |
|
|
|
3,362 |
|
|
|
(2,384.4 |
) |
GNS |
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment profit (loss) |
|
$ |
(30,552 |
) |
|
$ |
1,332 |
|
|
$ |
31,884 |
|
|
|
(104.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-performance items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate selling and marketing |
|
|
(25,377 |
) |
|
|
(25,597 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
Corporate general and administrative |
|
|
(6,969 |
) |
|
|
(9,340 |
) |
|
|
(2,371 |
) |
|
|
34.0 |
|
Stock compensation costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
(1,860 |
) |
|
|
(2,195 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
18.0 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
(1,214 |
) |
|
|
(934 |
) |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(879 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
(82.6 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(12,667 |
) |
|
|
(9,653 |
) |
|
|
3,014 |
|
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
In-process research and development |
|
|
(30,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,200 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Restructuring costs |
|
|
(13,547 |
) |
|
|
(4,355 |
) |
|
|
9,192 |
|
|
|
(67.9 |
) |
Long-lived asset impairments |
|
|
(7,217 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
7,242 |
|
|
|
(100.3 |
) |
Recovery of sale, export, use tax liability and
payments |
|
|
3,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,457 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Provision for doubtful accounts, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,604 |
) |
|
|
(2,604 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Accelerated amortization of leasehold |
|
|
(12,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,504 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Interest and other financial charges, net |
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
4,266 |
|
|
|
(246.2 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
(58.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss |
|
$ |
(141,467 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,027 |
) |
|
$ |
90,440 |
|
|
|
(63.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
|
|
|
TSG segment loss decreased from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the third
quarter of fiscal 2005 primarily due to increased revenue, increased gross profit and
lower research and development costs. |
|
|
|
|
BBG segment profit increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the third
quarter of fiscal 2005 due to increased revenue and lower research and development costs. |
|
|
|
|
GNS segment profit increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the
third quarter of fiscal 2005 due to increased revenue. |
Nine months ended July 31, 2004 compared to nine months ended July 31, 2005
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating
segment revenues for the nine months ended July 31, 2004 to the nine months ended July 31, 2005 for
our four operating segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
%* |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSG |
|
$ |
152,635 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
$ |
182,638 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
|
|
$ |
30,003 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
DNG |
|
|
13,839 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
28,302 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
14,463 |
|
|
|
104.5 |
|
BBG |
|
|
14,962 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
60,426 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
45,464 |
|
|
|
303.9 |
|
GNS |
|
|
35,266 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
37,708 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
2,442 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenue |
|
$ |
216,702 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
309,074 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
92,372 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes % of total revenue |
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
26
|
|
|
TSG revenue increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to the first
nine months of fiscal 2005 due to increased sales of long haul transport products and
sales of our optical Ethernet transport products obtained from our May 2004 acquisition of
Internet Photonics. As a result of the timing of this acquisition, nine month segment
revenue for 2004 only reflects one quarter of revenue from these acquired products. |
|
|
|
|
DNG revenue increased from the first nine months of 2004 to the first nine
months of fiscal 2005 due to increased sales of multiservice edge switching products,
primarily in support of new service aggregation and broadband deployments at Verizon
during the first fiscal quarter of 2005. |
|
|
|
|
BBG revenue increased for the first nine months of 2004 to the first nine
months of fiscal 2005 due to increased sales of CNX-5 Broadband DSL Systems from our May
2004 acquisition of Catena Networks. As a result of the timing of this acquisition, nine
month segment revenue for 2004 only reflects one quarter of revenue from these acquired
products. |
|
|
|
|
GNS revenue increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to the first
nine months of fiscal 2005 due to an increase in sales of training and managed services. |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our segment
profit (loss) and the reconciliation to consolidated net loss for the nine months ended July 31,
2004 to nine months ended July 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
%** |
|
Segment
profit (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSG |
|
$ |
(94,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,343 |
) |
|
$ |
65,684 |
|
|
|
(69.9 |
) |
DNG |
|
|
(9,490 |
) |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
9,919 |
|
|
|
(104.5 |
) |
BBG |
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
(820 |
) |
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
119.3 |
|
GNS |
|
|
3,589 |
|
|
|
5,179 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment loss |
|
$ |
(100,302 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,555 |
) |
|
$ |
76,747 |
|
|
|
(76.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-performance items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate selling and marketing |
|
|
(69,402 |
) |
|
|
(70,895 |
) |
|
|
(1,493 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
Corporate general and administrative |
|
|
(20,052 |
) |
|
|
(25,538 |
) |
|
|
(5,486 |
) |
|
|
27.4 |
|
Stock compensation costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
(5,473 |
) |
|
|
(4,048 |
) |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
(26.0 |
) |
Selling and marketing |
|
|
(2,147 |
) |
|
|
(4,257 |
) |
|
|
(2,110 |
) |
|
|
98.3 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
(1,079 |
) |
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
(53.2 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(19,458 |
) |
|
|
(30,268 |
) |
|
|
(10,810 |
) |
|
|
55.6 |
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
(30,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,200 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Restructuring costs |
|
|
(22,125 |
) |
|
|
(15,245 |
) |
|
|
6,880 |
|
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
Long-lived asset impairments |
|
|
(7,217 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
7,083 |
|
|
|
(98.1 |
) |
Recovery of sale, export, use tax liability
and payments |
|
|
5,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,388 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
(Provision for) benefit for doubtful
accounts, net |
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
(2,604 |
) |
|
|
(5,398 |
) |
|
|
(193.2 |
) |
Accelerated amortization of leasehold |
|
|
(14,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,153 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Interest and other financial charges, net |
|
|
(9,921 |
) |
|
|
(4,665 |
) |
|
|
5,256 |
|
|
|
(53.0 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss |
|
$ |
(294,391 |
) |
|
$ |
(182,829 |
) |
|
$ |
111,562 |
|
|
|
(37.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Denotes % change from 2004 to 2005 |
|
|
|
TSG segment loss decreased from the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to the
first nine months of fiscal 2005 primarily due to increased revenue, increased gross
profit and lower research and development costs. |
|
|
|
|
DNG segment profit increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to the
first nine months of fiscal 2005 due to increased in revenue, increased gross profit and
lower research and development costs. |
|
|
|
|
BBG segment loss increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to the
first nine months of fiscal 2005 due to the increased research and development cost
partially offset by increased sales of CNX-5 Broadband DSL Systems. BBG activity consists
of the acquired operations of Catena Networks, which was |
27
|
|
|
acquired in May 2004. As a result
of the timing of this acquisition, nine month segment loss for 2004 primarily reflects one
quarter of segment operating activities. |
|
|
|
|
GNS segment profit increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to the
first nine months of fiscal 2005 due to reduced service overhead costs. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cienas principal source of liquidity is its cash and cash equivalents, and short-term and
long-term investments. At July 31, 2005, we had $313.6 million in cash and cash equivalents, and
$803.1 million in short-term and long-term investments. Our investment portfolio consists primarily
of fixed-income securities, with maturities of two years or less, diversified among industries and
individual issuers. Our investments are generally liquid, investment grade securities.
Cienas operating activities consumed $197.2 million and $119.2 million net cash during the
first nine months of fiscal 2004 and 2005, respectively. The primary reason for operating cash
consumption was the net loss incurred during the periods.
Our investing activities provided net cash of $178.4 million and $261.5 million during the
first nine months of fiscal 2004 and 2005, respectively. Investment activities included the net
redemption of $197.4 million and $265.3 million of short and long-term investments during the first
nine months of fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005, respectively.
Cash
used in financing activities was $35.1 million and $31.4 million during the first nine
months of fiscal 2004 and 2005 respectively. The primary use of cash in financing activities during
the first nine months of fiscal 2004 was related to the purchase of the remaining $48.2 million in
outstanding ONI 5.0% convertible subordinated notes. We paid $49.2 million for the notes and fees
related to the purchase. During the first nine months of fiscal 2004, we received $14.0 million
from the exercise of employee options and the sale of stock pursuant to the employee stock purchase
plan. The primary use of cash in financing activities during the
first nine months of fiscal 2005 was related to our open market purchase of
$41.2 million in principal amount of our outstanding 3.75%
convertible notes, due February 1, 2008, for $36.9 million in
cash. At July 31, 2005, an aggregate principal amount of
approximately $648.8 million remained outstanding. We intend to
continue to evaluate and pursue alternatives that enable us to exercise prudent cash management
and achieve cost savings relating to the repayment of our outstanding convertible notes. During the
first nine months of fiscal 2005, we received $5.5 million from the exercise of employee options
and the sale of stock pursuant to the employee stock purchase plan.
Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe that our cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, and cash generated from operations will satisfy our working
capital needs, capital expenditures, investment requirements, commitments, and other liquidity
requirements associated with our existing operations through at least the next 12 months.
Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of our future minimum payments under contractual obligations as of
July 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one |
|
|
One to three |
|
|
Three to five |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Convertible notes (1) |
|
$ |
709,572 |
|
|
$ |
24,328 |
|
|
$ |
24,328 |
|
|
$ |
660,916 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
188,502 |
|
|
|
36,512 |
|
|
|
60,587 |
|
|
|
49,615 |
|
|
|
41,788 |
|
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
|
68,559 |
|
|
|
68,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
966,633 |
|
|
$ |
129,399 |
|
|
$ |
84,915 |
|
|
$ |
710,531 |
|
|
$ |
41,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our 3.75% convertible notes have an aggregate principal amount of $648.8 million, due February 1, 2008. Interest is
payable on February 1st and August 1st of each year. |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase commitments related to amounts we are obligated to pay to our contract manufacturers and component
suppliers for inventory. |
28
Some of our commercial commitments, including some of the future minimum payments set
forth above, are secured by standby letters of credit. The following is a summary of our commercial
commitments secured by standby letters of credit by commitment expiration date, as of July 31, 2005
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one |
|
|
One to |
|
|
Three to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
three years |
|
|
five years |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
13,298 |
|
|
$ |
13,048 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Ciena does not engage in any off-balance sheet financing arrangements. In particular, we do
not have any interest in so-called limited purpose entities, which include special purpose entities
(SPEs) and structured finance entities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires Ciena to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we reevaluate our
estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, investments, intangible assets,
goodwill, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring, and contingencies and litigation. We
base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Among other things, these estimates form the basis for
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, reevaluation of certain estimates led to the
effects described below.
Revenue Recognition
Cienas products and services include hardware, software, and professional services. We
recognize revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement with the customer, we have
fulfilled our obligations under the arrangement, the price is fixed or determinable and
collectibility is reasonably assured. The third and fourth criteria may require us to make
significant judgments or estimates.
Reserve for Inventory Obsolescence
Ciena writes down inventory that has become obsolete or unmarketable by an amount equal to the
difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based on assumptions about
future demand and market conditions. During the first nine months of fiscal 2005, we recorded a
charge of $3.4 million primarily related to excess inventory due to a change in forecasted sales
for certain products. If actual market conditions differ from those we have assumed, we may be
required to take additional inventory write-downs or benefits.
Restructuring
As part of its restructuring costs, Ciena provides for the estimated cost of the net lease
expense for facilities that are no longer being used. The provision is equal to the fair value of
the minimum future lease payments offset by the fair value of the estimated sublease payments. Due
to the continued excess supply of commercial properties in certain markets where our unused
facilities are located, we have reduced our estimate of the total future sublease payments we will
receive. As a result, we recorded an additional restructuring cost of $15.2 million in the first
nine months of
fiscal 2005. As of July 31, 2005, Cienas accrued restructuring liability related to net lease
expense and other related charges was $71.6 million. The total minimum lease payments for these
restructured facilities are $95.3 million. These lease payments will be made over the remaining
lives of our leases, which range from one month to twelve years. If actual market conditions are
less favorable than those we have projected, we may be required to recognize additional
restructuring costs associated with these facilities.
29
Goodwill
At July 31, 2005, Cienas consolidated balance sheet included $408.6 million in goodwill. Due
to Cienas reorganization into operating segments, SFAS 142 requires that we assign goodwill to
Cienas reporting units. Ciena has determined its operating segments and reporting units are the
same. In accordance with SFAS 142 Ciena tests each reporting units goodwill for impairment on an
annual basis, and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would, more
likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. Based on the
operating results, forecasts, and business factors with the segments, Ciena recorded an impairment
loss of $371.7 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. If actual market conditions differ or
forecasts change at the time of our annual assessment in fiscal 2005 or in periods prior to our
annual assessment, we may be required to record additional goodwill impairment charges.
Intangible Assets
As of July 31, 2005, Cienas consolidated balance sheet included $174.8 million in other
intangible assets, net. We account for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets such as
equipment, furniture, fixtures, and other intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS 144. In accordance with SFAS 144, Ciena tests each intangible asset for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets carrying amount may not be
recoverable. Management does not believe that events or changes in circumstances have occurred
during the first nine months of fiscal 2005 that would indicate that our intangible asset carrying
amounts may not be recoverable. If actual market conditions differ or forecasts change, we may be
required to record impairment charges in future periods.
Investments
As of July 31, 2005 Cienas investments in privately held technology companies was $7.7
million. These investments are generally carried at cost as Ciena owns less than 20% of the voting
equity and does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over any of these companies.
These investments are inherently high risk as the market for technologies or products manufactured
by these companies are usually early stage at the time of the investment by Ciena and such markets
may never materialize or become significant. Ciena could lose its entire investment in some or all
of these companies. Ciena monitors these investments for impairment and makes appropriate
reductions in carrying values when necessary. Ciena recorded a net charge of $9.0 million during
the first nine months of fiscal 2005, from a decline in the fair values of certain equity
investments that were determined to be other than temporary. If actual market conditions differ,
Ciena may be required to record an additional charge in future periods.
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance
As of July 31, 2005, Ciena has recorded a valuation allowance of $1.1 billion against our
gross deferred tax assets of $1.1 billion. We calculated the valuation allowance in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires an assessment of both
positive and negative evidence when measuring the need for a valuation allowance. Positive
evidence, such as operating results during the most recent three-year period, is given more weight
because, due to our current lack of visibility, there is a greater degree of uncertainty that we
will achieve the level of future profitability needed to record the deferred assets. Our results
over the most recent three-year period were heavily affected by our recent business restructuring
activities. Our cumulative loss in the most recent three-year period represents sufficient negative
evidence to require a valuation allowance under the provisions of SFAS 109. We intend to maintain a
valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support its reversal.
Risk Factors
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other
information contained in this report, you should consider the following risk factors before
investing in our securities.
Our business and results of operations could continue to be adversely affected by conditions in the
communications industry.
The last few years have seen substantial changes in the communications industry. Many of our
customers and potential customers, including communications service providers that have
historically provided a significant portion of our sales, have confronted static or declining
revenue. Many existing or potential customers have experienced significant financial distress or
withdrawn from segments of the business, and some have gone out of business. These factors have
adversely affected our revenue and operating results.
30
This year, several large communications service providers have announced merger transactions.
These include proposed mergers between Verizon and MCI, and between SBC and AT&T, all of which have
been significant customers during prior periods. These mergers will have a major impact on the
future of the telecommunications industry. They will increase concentration of purchasing power
among a few large service providers and may result in delays in, or the curtailment of, investments
in communications networks, as a result of changes in strategy, network overlap or cost reduction
efforts.
The impact of the market factors above may continue to affect our business and results of
operations, in several meaningful ways:
|
|
|
capital expenditures by many of our customers may be flat or reduced; |
|
|
|
|
we will continue to have only limited ability to forecast the volume and product mix of our sales; and |
|
|
|
|
managing our expenditures and inventory will be difficult in light of the
uncertainties surrounding our business. |
Any one or a combination of these factors could have a material adverse impact on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face intense competition that could hurt our sales and profitability.
The markets in which we compete for sales of networking equipment, software and services are
extremely competitive, particularly the market for sales to communications service providers.
Competition in these markets is based on price, functionality, manufacturing capability,
installation, services, scalability and the ability of products and services to meet customers
network requirements. A small number of very large companies have historically dominated the
communications networking equipment industry. Our industry has also increasingly experienced
competition from low-cost producers in Asia. Many of our competitors have substantially greater
financial, technical and marketing resources, greater manufacturing capacity and better established
relationships with incumbent carriers and other potential customers than Ciena. As a result of
increased merger activity among communication service providers, there has been speculation of
consolidation among networking equipment providers, which, if it occurred, could cause some
competitors to grow even larger and more powerful.
We also compete with a number of smaller companies that provide significant competition for a
specific product or market. These competitors often base their products on the latest available
technologies. Due to the narrower focus of their efforts, these competitors may achieve commercial
availability of their products more quickly and may be more attractive to customers.
Increased competition in our markets has resulted in aggressive business tactics, including:
|
|
|
intense price competition; |
|
|
|
|
discounting resulting from sales of used equipment or inventory that a
competitor has written down or written off; |
|
|
|
|
early announcements of competing products and extensive marketing efforts; |
|
|
|
|
one-stop shopping options; |
|
|
|
|
competitors offering to repurchase Ciena equipment from existing customers; |
|
|
|
|
customer financing assistance; |
|
|
|
|
marketing and advertising assistance; and |
|
|
|
|
intellectual property assertions and disputes. |
The tactics described above can be particularly effective in an increasingly concentrated base
of potential
customers such as communications service providers. Our inability to compete successfully in
our markets would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We expect gross margin to fluctuate, and our product gross margins may be adversely affected by a
number of factors.
Our gross margin fluctuates from period to period and our product gross margins may continue
to be adversely affected by numerous factors, including:
|
|
|
increased price competition, including competition from low-cost producers in Asia; |
|
|
|
|
the mix in any period of higher and lower margin products and services; |
31
|
|
|
charges for excess or obsolete inventory; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the price or availability of components for our products; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to reduce product manufacturing costs; |
|
|
|
|
introduction of new products, with initial sales at relatively small volumes
with resulting higher production costs; and |
|
|
|
|
increased service, installation, warranty or repair costs. |
We expect product gross margin to continue to fluctuate on a quarterly basis. Fluctuations in
product gross margin may make it difficult to manage our business and attain profitability.
Our revenue and operating results can fluctuate unpredictably from quarter to quarter.
Current market conditions cause our revenue to fluctuate and make it difficult to make
reliable estimates of future revenue. Fluctuations in our revenue can lead to even greater
fluctuations in our operating results. Our budgeted expense levels depend in part on our
expectations of long-term future revenue. Any substantial adjustment to expenses to account for
lower levels of revenue is difficult and takes time. Consequently, if our revenue declines, our
levels of inventory, operating expense and general overhead would be high relative to revenue,
resulting in additional operating losses.
Other factors contribute to fluctuations in our revenue and operating results, including:
|
|
|
fluctuations in demand for our products and the timing and size of customer orders; |
|
|
|
|
changes in customers requirements, including changes or cancellations to orders from customers; |
|
|
|
|
satisfaction of contractual customer acceptance criteria and related revenue recognition issues; |
|
|
|
|
the introduction of new products by us or our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
readiness of customer sites for installation; |
|
|
|
|
manufacturing and shipment delays and deferrals; |
|
|
|
|
actual events, outcomes and amounts that differ from our assumptions and
estimates used in our determination of the value of certain assets (including goodwill and
other intangible assets), liabilities and other items reflected in our financial
statements; |
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting rules, including recording expenses associated with
equity based compensation awards; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions as well as those specific to our market
segments. |
Failure to establish and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could have a
material adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price.
Beginning with our annual report for our fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require us to include a report by our management on our
internal controls over financial reporting. Such report must contain an assessment by management of
the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal
year and a statement as to whether or not such internal controls are effective. Such report must
also contain a statement that our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an
attestation report on managements assessment of such internal controls.
In order to achieve timely compliance with Section 404, in fiscal 2004 we began a process to
document and evaluate our internal controls over financial reporting. Our efforts to comply with
Section 404 have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, significant costs, the
commitment of time and operational resources and the
diversion of managements attention. If our management identifies one or more material
weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting, we will be unable to assert that
these controls are effective. If we are unable to assert that our internal controls over financial
reporting are effective as of October 31, 2005 (or if our independent registered public accounting
firm is unable to attest that our managements report is fairly stated or they are unable to
express an opinion on our managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over
financial reporting or on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting), our
business may be harmed. Market perception of our financial condition and the trading price of our
stock may be adversely affected and customer perception of our business may suffer.
32
Our business and results of operations are affected by the competitive pressures faced by our
existing and potential communications service provider customers.
Traditional communications service providers are under increasing competitive pressure from
providers within their industry and other participants that offer, or seek to offer, overlapping or
similar services. These pressures are likely to continue to cause communications service providers
to seek to minimize the costs of the equipment that they buy. These competitive pressures may
result in pricing becoming a more important factor in customer purchasing decisions. Increased
focus on pricing may favor low-cost communications equipment vendors in Asia and larger competitors
that can spread the effect of price discounts across a broader offering of products and services
and across a larger customer base. These pressures may harm our competitive position and adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
We may not be successful in selling our products into new markets and developing and managing new
sales channels.
As we have expanded our product portfolio, we have entered and begun to sell our products in
new markets and to a broader customer base, including enterprises, cable operators, and federal,
state and local governments. To succeed in these new markets, we believe we must develop and manage
new sales channels and distribution arrangements. Because we have only limited experience in
developing and managing such channels, it is uncertain to what extent we will be successful. In
addition, sales to federal, state and local governments require compliance with complex procurement
regulations with which we have little experience. We may be unable to increase our sales to
government contractors if we determine that we cannot comply with applicable regulations. Our
failure to comply with regulations for existing contracts could result in civil, criminal or
administrative proceedings involving fines and suspension or debarment from federal government
contracts. Failure to succeed in these new markets will adversely affect our ability to grow our
customer base and revenues.
If we
do not maintain and expand our sales with large communications
service providers, our revenues and results of operations will suffer.
Our future success will depend on our ability to maintain and expand our sales to existing and
new communications service provider customers, particularly overseas. Many of our competitors have
long-standing relationships with such customers, which can pose significant obstacles to our sales
efforts. In addition, sales to large communications service providers typically involve lengthy
sales cycles, protracted or difficult contract negotiations and extensive product testing and
network certification. Communications service providers may insist upon terms and conditions,
including terms that negatively affect pricing, payment and the timing of revenue recognition, that
we deem too onerous or not in Cienas best interest. As a result of the obstacles above, we may
incur substantial expenses and devote time and resources to potential relationships that never
materialize or meet our expectations. Our revenues and results of
operations will suffer if we are unable to expand our business with and
sales to large communications service providers.
Product performance problems could damage our business reputation and limit our sales prospects.
The development and production of new products with high technology content is complicated and
often involves problems with software, components and manufacturing methods. Modifying our products
to enable customers to integrate them into a new type of network architecture entails similar
risks. If significant reliability, quality, or network monitoring problems develop as a result of
our product development, manufacturing or integration, a number of negative effects on our business
could result, including:
|
|
|
increased costs associated with fixing software or hardware defects, including
service and warranty expenses; |
|
|
|
|
payment of liquidated damages for performance failures; |
|
|
|
|
high inventory obsolescence expense; |
|
|
|
|
delays in collecting accounts receivable; |
|
|
|
|
reduced orders from existing or potential customers; and |
|
|
|
|
damage to our reputation. |
Because we outsource the manufacturing of many of our products to electronic manufacturing
service or EMS providers and expect to increasingly rely upon direct order fulfillment, through
which our manufacturers will test our products on our behalf and deliver them directly to
customers, we may be subject to product performance problems as a result of the acts or omissions
of these third parties.
33
We must continue to make substantial investments in product development in order to keep pace with
technological advances and succeed in existing and new markets for our products.
In order to be successful, we must balance our initiatives to reduce our operating costs
against the need to keep pace with technological advances. The market for communications networking
equipment, software and services is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent
introductions of new products, and recurring changes in customer requirements. To succeed, we must
continue to develop new products and new features for existing products that meet customer
requirements and market demand. In addition, we must be able to identify and gain access to new
technologies as our market segments evolve. Because our market segments are constantly evolving, we
may allocate development resources toward products or technologies for which market demand is lower
than anticipated. Managing our efforts to keep pace with new technologies and reduce operating
expense is difficult and there is no assurance that we will be successful.
We may be required to take further write-downs of goodwill.
As of July 31, 2005, we had $408.6 million of goodwill on our balance sheet. This amount
primarily represents the remaining excess of the total purchase price of our acquisitions over the
fair value of the net assets acquired. At July 31, 2005, goodwill represented approximately 21.2%
of our total assets. During the fourth quarter of 2004, we incurred a goodwill impairment charge of
approximately $371.7 million. If we are required to record additional impairment charges related to
goodwill and other intangible assets, such charges would have the effect of decreasing our earnings
or increasing our losses in such period. If we are required to take a substantial impairment
charge, our earnings per share or net loss per share would be materially adversely affected in such
period.
We may not be successful in enhancing and upgrading our products.
Because our products are based on complex technology, we can experience unanticipated delays
in developing, improving, manufacturing or deploying them. At any given time, various enhancements
to our products are in the development phase and are not yet ready for commercial manufacturing or
deployment. The maturing process from laboratory prototype to customer trials, and subsequently to
general availability, involves a number of steps, including:
|
|
|
completion of product development; |
|
|
|
|
the qualification and sourcing of critical components; |
|
|
|
|
validation of manufacturing methods and processes; |
|
|
|
|
extensive quality assurance and reliability testing, and staffing of testing infrastructure; |
|
|
|
|
validation of software; and |
|
|
|
|
establishment of systems integration and systems test validation requirements. |
Each of these steps, in turn, presents serious risks of failure, rework or delay, any one of
which could decrease the speed and scope of product introduction and marketplace acceptance of the
product. Specialized application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) and intensive software
testing and validation are key to the timely introduction of enhancements to several of our
products, and schedule delays are common in the final validation phase, as well as in the
manufacture of specialized ASICs. In addition, unexpected intellectual property disputes, failure
of critical design elements, and a host of other execution risks may delay or even prevent the
introduction of these products. If we do not develop and successfully introduce products in a
timely manner, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be harmed.
We may incur significant costs and our competitive position may suffer as a result of our efforts
to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights or respond to claims of infringement from
others.
Despite efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or
otherwise obtain and use our products or technology. This is likely to become an increasingly
important issue as we expand our operations and product development into countries that provide a
lower level of intellectual property protection. Monitoring unauthorized use of our products is
difficult, and we cannot be certain that the steps that we are taking will prevent unauthorized use
of our technology. If competitors are able to use our technology, our ability to compete
effectively could be harmed.
34
In recent years, we have filed suit to enforce our intellectual property rights and have been
subject to several claims of patent infringement, including our pending patent litigation with
Nortel Networks. We may become involved in additional disputes in the future. Such lawsuits can be
costly, may significantly divert the time and attention of our personnel and may result in
counterclaims of infringement. In some cases, we have been required us to pay the patent holders
substantial sums or enter into license agreements requiring ongoing royalty payments in order to
resolve these matters. The frequency of assertions of patent infringement is increasing as patent
holders use such actions as a competitive tactic as well as to seek alternative sources of revenue.
If we are sued for infringement and are unsuccessful in defending the suit, we could be subject to
significant damages, and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We may be required to write off significant amounts of inventory.
Historically,
we have placed the majority of our orders to manufacture components or complete assemblies
for many of our products only when we have firm orders from our customers.
Because this practice can result in delays in the delivery of products to customers, we are
increasingly ordering equipment and components from our suppliers based on forecasts of customer
demand across all of our products. We believe this change is necessary in response to increased
customer insistence upon shortened delivery terms. This change in our inventory purchases exposes
us to the risk that our customers will not order those products for which we have forecasted sales,
or will purchase fewer than the number of products we have forecasted. In such event, we may be
required to write off, or write down inventory, potentially resulting in an accounting charge that
could materially affect our results of operations for the quarter in which such charge occurs.
We must manage our relationships with electronic manufacturing service (EMS) providers in order to
ensure that our product requirements are met timely and effectively.
We
rely on EMS providers to perform the majority of the manufacturing
operations for our products and components, and are
increasingly utilizing overseas suppliers, particularly in Asia. The qualification of these providers is an expensive and time-consuming process, and
these manufacturers build product for other companies, including our competitors. In addition, we
do not have contracts in place with some of these providers. We may not be able to effectively
manage our relationships with our EMS providers, particularly overseas. We cannot be certain that
our EMS providers will be able to fill our orders in a timely manner. If we underestimate our
future product requirements, the EMS providers may not have enough product to meet our customer
requirements, and this could result in delays in the shipment of our products which could harm our
business. If we overestimate product requirements, we may have to write off excess inventory. In
addition, because EMS providers are subject to many of the same risks as equipment vendors serving
the communications industry, many EMS providers have experienced their own financial difficulties,
which may affect their ability to obtain components and to timely deliver products to Ciena or to
end users through direct order fulfillment.
We are constantly reviewing our manufacturing capability, including the work of our EMS
providers, to ensure that our production requirements are met in terms of cost, capacity, quality
and reliability. From time to time, we may decide to transfer the manufacturing of a product from
one EMS provider to another, to better meet our production needs. It is possible that we may not
effectively manage this transition or the new contract manufacturer may not perform as well as
expected and, as a result, we may not be able to fill orders in a timely manner, which could harm
our business.
Our failure to manage our service delivery partners effectively could adversely impact our
financial results and relationship with customers.
We rely on a number of service delivery partners, both domestic and international, to
complement our global service and support resources. The certification of these partners incurs
costs and is time-consuming, and these partners service products for other companies, including our
competitors. We may not be able to effectively manage our relationships with our partners and we
cannot be certain that they will be able to deliver our services in the
manner or time required. If our service partners are unsuccessful in delivering services:
|
|
|
our services revenue may be adversely affected; |
|
|
|
|
our relationship with customers could suffer; and |
|
|
|
|
we may suffer delays in recognizing revenues in cases where revenue recognition
is dependent upon product installation, testing and acceptance. |
35
We depend on a limited number of suppliers, and for some items we do not have a substitute
supplier.
We depend on a limited number of suppliers for components of our products, as well as for
equipment used to manufacture and test our products. Our products include several high-performance
components for which reliable, high-volume suppliers are particularly limited. Some key optical and
electronic components we use in our products are currently available only from sole or limited
sources, and in some cases, that source also is a competitor. The loss of a source of key
components could require us to re-engineer products that use those components, which would increase
our costs. Delays in component availability or delivery, or component performance problems, could
result in delayed deployment of our products and our inability to recognize revenue. These delays
could also harm our business reputation, customer relationships and our results of operations.
Our international operations could expose us to additional risk and result in increased operating
expense.
We market, sell and service our products globally. We have established offices around the
world, including in North America, Europe, Latin America and the Asia Pacific region. In addition,
we are increasingly relying upon overseas suppliers, particularly in Asia, to manufacture our
products and components. We expect that our international activities will be dynamic over the
foreseeable future as we enter some new markets and withdraw from or reduce operations in others in
order to match our resources with revenue opportunities. These changes to our international
operations will require significant management attention and financial resources. In some
countries, our success will depend in part on our ability to form relationships with local
partners. Our inability to identify appropriate partners or reach mutually satisfactory
arrangements for international sales of our products could impact our ability to maintain or
increase international market demand for our products.
International operations are subject to inherent risks, and our future results could be
adversely affected by a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of recessions in economies outside the United States; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
certification requirements; |
|
|
|
|
reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; |
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences; |
|
|
|
|
political and economic instability; |
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures and other regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
effects of changes in currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
service provider and government spending patterns; and |
|
|
|
|
natural disasters and epidemics. |
Our efforts to offshore certain resources and operations to India may not be successful and may
expose us to unanticipated costs or liabilities.
In order to reduce ongoing operating expenses and maximize our resources, we have begun to
execute our plan to establish a development operation in India. We have limited experience in
offshoring our business functions and there is no assurance that our plan will enable us to achieve
meaningful cost reductions or greater resource efficiency. Further, offshoring to India involves
significant risks, including:
|
|
|
misappropriation of intellectual property or confidential information, including
information that is proprietary to Ciena, its customers and other third parties; |
|
|
|
|
heightened exposure to changes in the economic, security and political conditions of India; |
|
|
|
|
currency exchange and tax risks associated with offshore operations; and |
|
|
|
|
development efforts that do not meet our requirements because of language,
cultural or other differences associated with international operations, resulting
in errors or delays. |
Difficulties resulting from the factors above and other risks associated with offshoring could
impair our development efforts, harm our competitive position and damage our reputation with
existing and potential customers. These factors could be disruptive to our business and may cause
us to incur substantial unanticipated costs or expose
us to unforeseen liabilities.
36
The steps that we are taking to restructure and reduce the size of our operations could disrupt our
business.
We regularly review our operations to ensure that our business resources are aligned with
market opportunities. We have taken several steps, including reductions in force, dispositions of
assets and office closures, and internal reorganization of our sales and engineering functions to
reduce the size and cost of our operations and to better match our resources with our market
opportunities. During the next six to twelve months we expect to take additional steps to reduce
our operating expenses. These efforts could be disruptive to our business. Reductions to headcount
and other cost cutting measures may result in the loss of technical expertise that could adversely
affect our research and development efforts and ability to meet product development schedules.
These decisions often result in the recording of accounting charges, such as inventory and
technology-related write-offs, workforce reduction costs, charges relating to consolidation of
excess facilities, or claims from resellers or users of discontinued products. If we are required
to take a substantial charge, our earnings per share or net loss per share would be adversely
affected in such period. If we cannot manage our cost reduction and restructuring efforts
effectively, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed.
We may be required to assume warranty, service and other unexpected obligations in connection with
our resale of complementary products of other companies.
We have entered into agreements with strategic partners that permit us to distribute the
products of other companies. As part of our strategy to diversify our product portfolio and
customer base, we may enter into additional resale agreements in the future. To the extent we
succeed in reselling the products of these companies, we may be required by customers to assume
certain warranty and service obligations. While our suppliers often agree to support us with
respect to these obligations, we may be required to extend greater protection in order to effect a
sale. Moreover, our suppliers are relatively small companies with limited financial resources. If
they are unable to provide the required support, we may have to expend our own resources to do so.
This risk is amplified because the equipment that we are selling has been designed and manufactured
by other third parties and may be subject to warranty claims, the magnitude of which we are unable
to evaluate fully.
Our exposure to the credit risks of our customers may make it difficult to collect receivables and
could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Industry and economic conditions have weakened the financial position of some of our
customers. To sell to some of these customers, we may be required to take risks of uncollectible
accounts. While we monitor these situations carefully and attempt to take appropriate measures to
protect ourselves, it is possible that we may have to write down or write off doubtful accounts.
Such write-downs or write-offs would negatively affect our operating results for the period in
which they occur, and, if large, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and
financial condition.
If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may be unable to manage our business
effectively.
If we are unable to retain and motivate our existing employees and attract qualified personnel
to fill key positions, we may be unable to effectively develop our existing products, increase
sales and effect our strategic repositioning. Because we generally do not have employment contracts
with our employees, we must rely upon providing competitive compensation packages and a dynamic
work environment to retain and motivate employees. In response to the decline in our revenue and
weakness in the communications networking equipment market, we have paid our employees
significantly reduced or no bonuses since the end of fiscal 2001. Because our compensation packages
include equity-based incentives, pressure on our stock price could affect our ability to continue
to offer competitive compensation packages to our employees. In addition to these compensation
issues, we must continue to motivate
employees to execute our strategies and achieve our goals, which may be difficult due to
morale challenges posed by the workforce reductions and uncertainty in our industry.
If we lose members of our management team or other key personnel, it may be difficult to
replace them. It may also be difficult to effectively execute our strategy of positioning Ciena to
benefit from opportunities in new markets. Competition for highly skilled technical and other
personnel with experience in our industry can be intense. As a result, we may not be successful in
identifying, recruiting and hiring qualified engineers and other key personnel.
37
Our strategy of pursuing strategic acquisitions and investments may expose us to increased costs
and unexpected liabilities.
Our business strategy includes acquiring or making strategic investments in other companies to
increase our portfolio of products and services, expand the markets we address, diversify our
customer base and acquire or accelerate the development of new or improved products. To do so, we
may use cash, issue equity that would dilute our current stockholders ownership, incur debt or
assume indebtedness. Strategic investments and acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:
|
|
|
difficulties in integrating the operations, technologies and products of the acquired companies; |
|
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention; |
|
|
|
|
potential difficulties in completing projects of the acquired company and costs
related to in-process research and development; |
|
|
|
|
the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company; |
|
|
|
|
subsequent amortization expenses related to intangible assets and charges
associated with impairment of goodwill; |
|
|
|
|
dependence on unfamiliar or relatively small supply partners; and |
|
|
|
|
exposure to unanticipated liabilities, including intellectual property infringement claims. |
As a result of these and other risks, any acquisitions or strategic investments may not reap
the intended benefits and may ultimately have a negative impact on our business, results of
operation and financial condition.
We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
Historically, our primary exposure to currency exchange rates has been related to non-dollar
denominated operating expenses in Europe, Asia and Canada where we sell primarily in U.S. dollars.
As we increase our international sales and utilization of international suppliers, we may decide to
transact business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. As a result, we would be subject to the
impact of foreign exchange translation on our financial statements. For those countries outside the
United States where we have significant sales, a devaluation in the local currency would result in
reduced revenue and operating profit and reduce the value of our local inventory presented in our
financial statements. In addition, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may make our
products more expensive for customers to purchase or increase our operating costs, thereby
adversely affecting our competitiveness. To date, we have not significantly hedged against foreign
currency fluctuations; however, we may pursue hedging alternatives in the future. Although exposure
to currency fluctuations to date has not had an adverse effect on our business, there can be no
assurance that exchange rate fluctuations in the future will not have a material adverse effect on
our revenue from international sales and, consequently, our business, operating results and
financial condition.
Our stock price is volatile.
Our common stock price has experienced substantial volatility in the past, and is likely to
remain volatile in the future. Volatility can arise as a result of a number of the factors
discussed in this Risk Factors section, as well as divergence between our actual or anticipated
financial results and published expectations of analysts, and announcements that we, our
competitors, or our customers may make.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The following discussion about Cienas market risk disclosures involves forward-looking
statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. Ciena is exposed to market risk
related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Ciena does not use
derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. Ciena maintains a short-term and long-term investment portfolio.
These available-for-sale securities are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if
market interest rates increase. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly
by 10% from levels at July 31, 2005, the fair value of the portfolio would decline by approximately
$53.4 million.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. As a global concern, Ciena faces exposure to adverse movements
in foreign currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as business practices
evolve and if our exposure
38
increases, adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates could
have a material adverse impact on Cienas financial results. Historically Cienas primary exposures
have been related to non-dollar denominated operating expenses in Canada, Europe and Asia where
Ciena sells primarily in U.S. dollars. Ciena is prepared to hedge against fluctuations in foreign
currency if this exposure becomes material. As of July 31, 2005, the assets and liabilities of
Ciena related to non-dollar denominated currencies were not material. Therefore, we do not expect
an increase or decrease of 10% in the foreign exchange rate would have a material impact on Cienas
financial position.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Cienas management, with the participation of Cienas Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and
have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, they were effective.
There was no change in Cienas internal control over financial reporting during Cienas last
fiscal quarter that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Cienas
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On October 3, 2000, Stanford University and Litton Systems filed a complaint in the United
States District Court for the Central District of California alleging that optical fiber amplifiers
incorporated into Cienas products infringe U.S. Patent No. 4,859,016 (the 016 Patent). The
complaint seeks injunctive relief, royalties and damages. On October 10, 2003, the court stayed the case
pending final resolution of matters before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO),
including a request for and disposition of a reexamination of the 016 Patent. On October 16, 2003
and November 2, 2004, the PTO granted reexaminations of the 016 Patent, resulting in a
continuation of the stay of the case. Ciena believes that it has valid defenses
to the lawsuit and intends to defend it vigorously in the event the
stay of the case is lifted.
As a result of our merger with ONI Systems Corp. in June 2002, we became a defendant in a
securities class action lawsuit. Beginning in August 2001, a number of substantially identical
class action complaints alleging violations of the federal securities laws were filed in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York. These complaints name ONI, Hugh C.
Martin, ONIs former chairman, president and chief executive officer; Chris A. Davis, ONIs former
executive vice president, chief financial officer and administrative officer; and certain
underwriters of ONIs initial public offering as defendants. The complaints were consolidated into
a single action, and a consolidated amended complaint was filed on April 24, 2002. The amended
complaint alleges, among other things, that the underwriter defendants violated the securities laws
by failing to disclose alleged compensation arrangements (such as undisclosed commissions or stock
stabilization practices) in the initial public offerings registration statement and by engaging in
manipulative practices to artificially inflate the price of ONIs common stock after the initial
public offering. The amended complaint also alleges that ONI and the named former officers violated
the securities laws on the basis of an alleged failure to disclose the underwriters alleged
compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. No specific amount of damages has been
claimed. Similar complaints have been filed against more than 300 other issuers that have had
initial public offerings since 1998, and all of these actions have been included in a single
coordinated proceeding. Mr. Martin and Ms. Davis have been dismissed from the action without
prejudice pursuant to a tolling agreement. In July 2004, following mediated settlement
negotiations, the plaintiffs, the issuer defendants (including Ciena), and their insurers entered
into a settlement agreement, whereby the plaintiffs cases against the issuers are to be dismissed.
The plaintiffs and issuer defendants subsequently moved the court for preliminary approval of the
settlement agreement, which motion was opposed by the underwriter defendants. On February 15, 2005,
the district court granted the motion for preliminary approval of the settlement agreement, subject
to certain modifications to the proposed bar order, and directed the parties to submit a revised
settlement agreement reflecting its opinion. If the parties are able to agree upon the required
modifications, and such modifications are
acceptable to the court, notice will be given to all class members of the settlement, a
fairness hearing will be held and, if the court determines that the settlement is fair to the
class members, the settlement will be approved.
On January 18, 2005, Ciena filed a complaint in the United States District Court, Eastern
District of Texas, Marshall Division against Nortel Networks, Inc., Nortel Networks Corporation and
Nortel Networks Limited (collectively, Nortel), which complaint was subsequently amended. Cienas
amended complaint charges Nortel with infringement of nine patents related to Cienas
communications networking systems and technology. Ciena seeks to enjoin Nortels infringing
activities and recover damages caused by such infringement. On March 14, 2005, Nortel filed an
answer to Cienas complaint and a counterclaim against Ciena, each of which have subsequently been
39
amended. Nortels amended counterclaim charges Ciena with infringement of 13 patents related to
Nortels communications networking systems and technology, including certain of Nortels SONET, ATM
and VLAN systems and technology. Nortels counterclaim seeks injunctive relief and damages. This
matter is currently scheduled for trial in June 2006.
In addition to the matters described above, we are subject to various legal proceedings,
claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these
matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these
matters will have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(a)(d) Not applicable
(e) The following table provides information with respect to any purchase made by or on behalf of
Ciena, or any affiliated purchaser as defined in 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-18(a)(3), of shares of any
class of equity securities registered by Ciena pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
|
appropriate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares purchased |
|
|
dollar value) of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as part of |
|
|
shares that may |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
publicly |
|
|
yet be purchased |
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
|
Average price |
|
|
announced plans |
|
|
under the plans |
|
Period |
|
shares purchased |
|
|
paid per share |
|
|
or programs (1) |
|
|
or programs |
|
May 1, 2005 through May 28, 2005 |
|
|
11,605 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
11,605 |
|
|
|
* |
|
May 29, 2005 through June 25, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
June 26, 2005 through July 30, 2005 |
|
|
7,165 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
7,165 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
18,770 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
18,770 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Not applicable. See description of repurchase activity below. |
|
(1) |
|
As initially disclosed in our Form 10-Q for the first quarter of fiscal 2005, Ciena
does not repurchase its shares in open market transactions. The repurchase activity in the
table above consists solely of Cienas repurchase of outstanding shares in private
transactions with certain former employees. Pursuant to the terms of equity compensation
plans and certain award agreements that Ciena assumed in connection with its acquisitions
of WaveSmith Networks and Catena Networks, employees may exercise stock options or
restricted stock prior to vesting. Under these plans, upon the employees termination of
employment, Ciena is granted the right to repurchase the shares issued, to the extent that
the option or restricted stock has not vested, at the grantees exercise price. |
|
|
|
Ciena believes it is in the best interest of its stockholders, and it is corporate practice,
to repurchase shares subject to these award agreements if the closing price of such shares
on the Nasdaq Stock Market is greater than the grantees exercise price during the 30 day
period following separation or termination of
employment. At the end of our third quarter of fiscal 2005, 121,268 outstanding shares
remained subject to repurchase pursuant to the terms above. This number of shares subject
to Ciena repurchase will (i) increase, to extent that holders of equity awards under these
plans exercise any options or restricted stock that have not yet vested, and (ii) decrease,
as such awards vest pursuant to their terms and Cienas repurchase rights lapse. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
40
Item 4. Submission of matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CIENA CORPORATION
|
|
Date: September 1, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Gary B. Smith
|
|
|
|
Gary B. Smith |
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
(Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: September 1, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Joseph R. Chinnici
|
|
|
|
Joseph R. Chinnici |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance
and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Finance Officer) |
|
42
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CIENA CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Gary B. Smith, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Ciena Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) [Paragraph reserved pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: September 1, 2005
|
|
|
/s/ Gary B. Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary B. Smith |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CIENA CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Joseph R. Chinnici, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Ciena Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) [Paragraph reserved pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: September 1, 2005
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph R. Chinnici
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph R. Chinnici |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
CIENA CORPORATION
Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Ciena Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:
(a) the Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended July 31, 2005 filed on the
date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
/s/ Gary B. Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary B. Smith |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
September 1, 2005 |
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Ciena Corporation and will be retained by Ciena Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv32w2
EXHIBIT 32.2
CIENA CORPORATION
Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Ciena Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:
(a) the Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended July 31, 2005 filed on the
date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph R. Chinnici
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph R. Chinnici |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
September 1, 2005 |
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Ciena Corporation and will be retained by Ciena Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.